Start with a free technical scoping call. We discuss your product, your current testing approach, your tech stack, your release cadence, and your primary quality pain points. We then match you with a pre-vetted QA engineer whose testing specialisation, automation capability, and working style align with your team and product. Most clients are matched and contributing to quality within days of that first conversation.

A manual tester executes structured and exploratory tests, documents defects, and verifies fixes — providing an independent quality perspective on every release. A QA automation engineer builds and maintains test automation frameworks that run tests programmatically, enabling continuous quality checks in CI/CD pipelines without manual execution. Most mature products need both — manual for exploratory coverage and automation for regression confidence. We help you assess your current quality maturity and identify the right starting point during the scoping call.

Yes. Our engineers are experienced in integrating with GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins, CircleCI, and Bitrise pipelines — configuring automated test stages, quality gates, and deployment blocking rules within your existing infrastructure. They work within your current workflow rather than requiring you to change your delivery process.

Most clients begin within a few days of completing the initial requirements discussion. We maintain a pool of vetted, available QA engineers at all times — there is no cold recruitment process when you contact us.

Significantly. Senior QA engineers in the Netherlands typically command €45,000–€70,000 per year in salary, plus employer NI contributions, tool licences, and benefits. Our flexible plans deliver a fraction of that total investment — with no long-term employment commitment, no recruitment fees, and immediate contribution to your quality process from day one.

Before any engagement begins, we execute a data processing agreement (DPA) and NDA with your organisation. QA engineers formally test GDPR-relevant product flows — including consent banner functionality, opt-out and opt-in mechanism correctness, personal data handling in forms and APIs, cookie consent mode implementation, and right-to-erasure request processing. These are treated as functional requirements with test cases and pass/fail criteria, not informal checks.

You do — entirely. All test cases, automation scripts, framework configurations, test data sets, and QA documentation produced during the engagement belong to your organisation. This is contractually guaranteed before any work begins.

We offer a 14-day satisfaction guarantee covering fit and onboarding. Beyond that, our account team monitors quality output throughout the engagement and works with you and the engineer to address any systematic gaps proactively. No QA process eliminates all defects — but a well-structured QA engagement dramatically reduces production bug frequency, and we track defect escape rates as a key performance indicator throughout every engagement.

Yes. Many of our QA engineers cover both web and mobile testing — using cross-platform tools like Playwright for web and Appium or Detox for mobile. Where a product requires deep native mobile testing (iOS XCTest or Android Espresso), we confirm platform-specific mobile QA experience during the matching process before placement.

Yes. Many clients begin with a single QA engineer providing manual and exploratory coverage, and expand their quality function as the product matures — adding a dedicated automation engineer, a performance testing specialist, a security tester, or a QA lead through the same managed engagement model. We make that transition seamless and cost-predictable at every stage of your quality maturity journey.